CO₂ emissions fall 25% by 2050, but more progress is needed

  • Efficiency improvements and renewables are necessary but not a complete solution.
  • Technologies like hydrogen, carbon capture and storage, and biofuels have yet to reach their full potential but are needed to reduce emissions on a global scale.
  • With the right policies and technology advancements, these solutions can help society move closer to achieving its climate goals.
  • There are multiple potential emissions pathways to achieve society’s climate goals, giving policy makers an opportunity to balance affordability and emissions reduction.

For the first time in modern history, emissions are projected to peak and begin a sustained decline this decade as economies expand and living standards improve. By 2050, we project global CO2 emissions to decline by 25% from current levels. This happens because efficiency will improve, and the world will use more lower-emissions technologies, including renewables, carbon capture and storage, hydrogen, and biofuels.

Global energy-related emissions
CO2 Billion metric tons

Image Global energy-related emissions
CO2 Billion metric tons

Source: 2024 IEA World Energy Outlook; IPCC: AR6 Scenarios Database hosted by IIASA release 1.0 average  IPCC C3: “Likely below 2°C” scenarios
Emissions do not contain industry process emissions or land use and natural sinks

Overall, energy-related CO2 emissions are projected to peak at approximately 36 billion metric tons per year sometime this decade and then decline to 27 billion metric tons per year in 2050.

That will be great progress. Even so, more is needed to reach emission levels consistent with keeping global temperature increases below 2°C. The average of the IPCC’s Likely Below 2°C scenarios requires energy-related CO2 emissions to fall to around 11 billion metric tons per year by 2050.

Energy-related emissions
CO2 Billion metric tons

Image Energy-related emissions
CO2 Billion metric tons

Source: IPCC: AR6 Scenarios Database hosted by IIASA release 1.0 average  IPCC C3: “Likely below 2°C” scenarios; ExxonMobil analysis
Emissions do not contain industry process emissions or land use and natural sinks

The IPCC and our Outlook see the need for both established and emerging technologies to progress faster, in some cases at an unprecedented buildout.

Solutions deployed in IPCC pathways
Quadrillion Btu growth 2020 to 2050

Image Solutions deployed in IPCC pathways
Quadrillion Btu growth 2020 to 2050

Source: IPCC: AR6 Scenarios Database hosted by IIASA release 1.0 average  IPCC C3: “Likely below 2°C” scenarios; ExxonMobil analysis; Growth from 2020-2050 across the average IPCC Likely below 2° C scenarios; uncertainty bars represent 10th percentile and 90th percentile scenarios

For example, the IPCC’s Likely Below 2°C scenarios suggest that wind and solar needs to grow at an average of 10% per year from 2020 – 2050, which is broadly in line with recent history. However, carbon capture and storage need to grow at more than 30% per year through 2050 to meet the IPCC’s Likely Below 2°C scenarios. CCS is not the only technology that will need to be accelerated on an immense scale. Low-carbon hydrogen and biofuels will need to play a much larger role as well.

Carbon capture and storage
CO2 Billion metric tons per year

Image Carbon capture and storage
CO2 Billion metric tons per year

Low-carbon hydrogen-based fuel use
Quadrillion Btu

Image Low-carbon hydrogen-based fuel use
Quadrillion Btu

Biofuels use
Million barrels per day of oil equivalent

Image Biofuels use
Million barrels per day of oil equivalent

Our Outlook projects that CCS, H2, and biofuels will increase ~130x, 80x, and 3x respectively by 2050 vs current levels; however, this is still below the level required in the IPCC Likely Below 2°C scenarios due primarily to a lack of policy support.

Why are CCS, hydrogen, and biofuels essential for reducing emissions?

We know that energy use will increase by 2050 to support a much larger population and economic growth. We also know that fossil fuels remain the most effective way to produce the enormous amounts of energy needed to support commercial transportation, manufacturing and industrial production, due to their high energy density and ease of transport. That’s why a critical goal of any energy transition will be to reduce emissions from these important “hard-to-decarbonize” sectors, which account for ~45% of all CO2 emissions today (including process emissions, excluding indirect emissions from electricity use).

Image Source: US Department of Energy Liftoff Reports, 2023; ExxonMobil Analysis
Excludes off-site power generation

Source: US Department of Energy Liftoff Reports, 2023; ExxonMobil Analysis
Excludes off-site power generation

When we say these sectors are “hard-to-decarbonize,” what we also mean is that they are “hard-to-electrify.” As even the IEA acknowledges, “Generating high-temperature heat from electricity, especially on a large scale and for electrically non-conductive applications, is impractical and costly with today’s technologies.” (IEA, 2020)

Looking across key industrial sectors, we can see the significant share of emissions from generating heat >400°C where electricity often isn’t currently a viable alternative, and from process emissions where chemical transformations of raw materials releases CO2.

These sectors will require multiple lower-carbon technologies to meet different needs.

  • Carbon capture and storage is the process of capturing CO2 emissions at the source and injecting it into deep underground geologic formations for safe, secure and permanent storage. CCS on its own, or in combination with hydrogen production, is among the few proven technologies that can significantly reduce CO2 emissions from high-emitting sectors, including process emissions.
  • Low-carbon hydrogen can replace traditional furnace fuel to decarbonize the industrial sector. Hydrogen and hydrogen-based fuels such as ammonia will be important for decarbonizing commercial transportation as technology improves to lower its cost, and policy develops to incentivize the needed infrastructure development.
  • Biofuels are expected to play an important role in decarbonizing the transportation space. Biofuels will be critical in helping to reduce emissions in aviation in particular, which cannot rely on electric batteries for commercial air travel.

Energy transition signposts

Our Signpost process helps us track the rate of deployment of key technologies.

Image 1.Actuals and history based on IEA history file (2024) and ExxonMobil 25 Global Outlook
2.Hydrogen and CCS history benchmarked from Wood Mackenzie Project Pipeline database (1Q 2025). CCS capacity for point source CO2 capture(excludes LNG, natural gas processing and upstream oil  gas production) 
3.Solar is utility solar; Solar history from BNEF Solar Tracker (1Q 2025); IEA solar projections converted to utility only based on STEPS, APS, and NZE forecast total solar, applying average historic proportion of commercial scale solar based on BNEF solar tracker. 
4.Wind capacity deployment history from BNEF Wind Tracker (1Q 2025)
5.Nuclear capacity deployment history from IAEA PRIS Database (1Q 2025)
6.STEPS, APS, and NZE projections from IEA 2024 World Energy Outlook (Oct 2024)
7.IPCC AR6 Scenarios Database hosted by IIASA release 1.0 average of 306 IPCC C3: Likely below 2C scenarios. Efficiency from primary energy per capita, excluding scenarios without 2025, 2030 population data.
8.IEA biofuels growth/yr (KBDOE) starts in 24 to align with 24 World Energy Outlook reporting
1.Actuals and history based on IEA history file (2024) and ExxonMobil ‘25 Global Outlook
2.Hydrogen and CCS history benchmarked from Wood Mackenzie Project Pipeline database (1Q 2025). CCS capacity for point source CO2 capture (excludes LNG, natural gas processing and upstream oil & gas production)
3.Solar is utility solar;  Solar history from BNEF Solar Tracker (1Q 2025); IEA solar projections converted to utility only based on STEPS, APS, and NZE forecast total solar, applying average historic proportion of commercial scale solar based on BNEF solar tracker.  
4.Wind capacity deployment history from BNEF Wind Tracker (1Q 2025)
5.Nuclear capacity deployment history from IAEA PRIS Database (1Q 2025)
6.STEPS, APS, and NZE projections from IEA 2024 World Energy Outlook (Oct 2024)
7.IPCC AR6 Scenarios Database hosted by IIASA release 1.0 average of 306 IPCC C3: “Likely below 2°C” scenarios. Efficiency from primary energy per capita, excluding scenarios without 2025, 2030 population data.
8.IEA biofuels growth/yr (KBDOE) starts in ‘24 to align with ‘24 World Energy Outlook reporting

These signposts provide valuable insight into current trends and what is needed to achieve a range of potential emissions pathways.

  • Solar and wind have seen significant acceleration in deployment over recent years, with the largest growth occurring in China.
  • Biofuels are also seeing substantial growth driven by both policy and market factors.
  • CCS and low-carbon hydrogen are essential technologies in all projections and scenarios, however, have not yet seen material deployment due to lack of policy support.
  • Per capita energy demand has continued to rise, driven by developing countries. This trend is projected to reverse this decade as more efficient solar, wind, and natural gas replace coal in power generation.

It is also clear that while there is a range of potential outcomes for each solution to 2030, all solutions need to increase deployment this decade. This is the case for our Global Outlook, IEA STEPS, IEA APS, IEA NZE, and the IPCC Likely Below 2°C scenarios.

What is needed to accelerate emissions reduction?

It has now been 20 years since the Kyoto protocol came into force, and 10 years since the Paris climate agreement. Yet, global energy related CO2 emissions continued to rise at ~1% per year in 2024, which is unchanged vs the 20-year average. This suggests a different policy approach may be needed to reach society’s climate goals.  

The IPCC scenarios highlight the importance of considering full climate impact when setting emissions targets, not just focusing on net zero timing. In fact, overly focusing on net zero timing has the potential to constrain energy supply, leading to price shocks which can cause consumers to lose confidence in the economy.

IPCC AR6 projected timing to net zero
# of scenarios at net zero CO2 emissions per 5 year interval

Image IPCC AR6 projected timing to net zero
# of scenarios at net zero CO2 emissions per 5 year interval
Source : IPCC: AR6 Scenarios Database hosted by International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) release 1.0 . IPCC scenarios label C1, C2, and C3;  Net zero CO2 emissions: when anthropogenic CO2 emissions are balanced globally by anthropogenic CO2 removals over a specified period; Anthropogenic CO2 means all CO2 (energy-related, process, agriculture, land use). It Excludes non-CO2 GHGs (e.g., CH4, CO, F-gases)

Further, there is no single emissions pathway that defines society’s climate goals. Looking at the IPCC Likely below 2°C scenarios (C3), we see the timing of net zero emissions ranges from ~2050 to >2100. Similarly for 1.5°C scenarios (C1/C2), we see the net zero timing ranges from ~2035 to 2080.

So, what is needed to affordably achieve society’s climate goals?

  • Policy should be designed in such a way to avoid sudden energy price spikes that will reduce consumer confidence AND support long-term economic growth which is essential to improving long-term affordability.
  • Technology advancements & deployment, supported by “all of the above” technology neutral policy frameworks, will over time reduce technology cost, further improving affordability.
  • Market-driven solutions must ultimately develop to naturally select the most cost-effective technologies for companies and consumers.

Want more information?  Explore our Advancing Climate Solutions

  • Industry and commercial transportation drive economic growth

    These sectors, which make up ~65% of global energy use, have unique needs that cannot be fully replaced with electricity or renewables.
    Learn more
  • Affordability will drive the pace of any energy transition

    Sustained economic growth and continued innovation to reduce costs for key technologies are essential for improving affordability.
    Learn more